 |
Will my next suitor more resemble Wilford Brimley, or . . . |
Prior to my date with
Oliver, my sister asked, "why would you go out with someone that old?"* Oliver is 40. I am 29. However, this doesn't phase me as I've largely dated older dudes, several approximately 10 years my senior, who seemed like a reasonable, relatable age. I think there is much more than numerical age.
Here are the categories at play, in my experience:
Numerical age (current year - birth year);
Physical age (how old one appears); and
Mental age (how old one behaves).
I have gone out with, and had male friends who are 10+ years older than me, numerically speaking, that I found very fun and attractive. They have likely been closer to my age with respect to mental age, and perhaps physical age. I've also gone out with and known men close to my age who are at a very different life stages than me and we had nothing in common. Again, the mental and, perhaps physical, ages didn't match up. I admittedly have limited experience with younger fellas, but maybe this experiment will change that . . .
 |
. . . this Peter-Pan looking child who was meant to be Zac Efron? |
Anyway, I can imagine a future where I go out with and pine for a 40 year old gent who is fun, charming and at a similar place in life to me. I realized my
First Date Oliver post could suggest that I don't like 40 year old men, or "old" men or whatever designation you could make based on the year a person was born. In reality, I found he seemed much more mature than I am, at a totally different place in his life, and therefore, I was largely incapable of relating to him.
Sooo, my point is, I don't discriminate based on numerical age (beyond those mandated by statute).
*My sister's husband is 6 years younger than her, so she is clearly biased.